<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I am going after these drops tomorrow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/</link>
	<description>Expired Domains Drop Catcher Blog With A Hint Of Domaining News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffcool</title>
		<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffcool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainafterlife.com/?p=377#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Maybe I am wrong but if a customer mandates a company (a registar) to take care and keep an asset secure (domain name) does it mean the whole asset can be taken by the company if the customer doesn&#039;t pay his service fee ? Is it not stealing ? Just a question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I am wrong but if a customer mandates a company (a registar) to take care and keep an asset secure (domain name) does it mean the whole asset can be taken by the company if the customer doesn&#8217;t pay his service fee ? Is it not stealing ? Just a question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dtagr</title>
		<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Dtagr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainafterlife.com/?p=377#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Tucows stinks. Unfortunately due to their position within CIRA their despicable behaviour is not likely to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tucows stinks. Unfortunately due to their position within CIRA their despicable behaviour is not likely to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainafterlife.com/?p=377#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the input everyone. I didn&#039;t mean to point the finger at Tucows &amp; it was a coincidence that they siphoned the domain secretly in pending delete state. I always heard about this, but never found a working example. I guess the date threw it off &amp; DNClips is right about the expiration date. Gazzip &amp; Patrick, I have to agree with you guys.

My how I wish I had the power the registrars have. It must be a shame &amp; slap to the face to whoever let this gem drop. I didn&#039;t chase stubby.us as I was determined Jacket.com was dropping since it came from the official Verisign pending delete list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the input everyone. I didn&#8217;t mean to point the finger at Tucows &#038; it was a coincidence that they siphoned the domain secretly in pending delete state. I always heard about this, but never found a working example. I guess the date threw it off &#038; DNClips is right about the expiration date. Gazzip &#038; Patrick, I have to agree with you guys.</p>
<p>My how I wish I had the power the registrars have. It must be a shame &#038; slap to the face to whoever let this gem drop. I didn&#8217;t chase stubby.us as I was determined Jacket.com was dropping since it came from the official Verisign pending delete list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainafterlife.com/?p=377#comment-363</guid>
		<description>&quot;It was renewed,so no one can grab it.&quot;

Bugui, a domain cannot be renewed in the Pending Release stage.
I believe Gazzip hit the nail on the head, &quot;TUCOWS has decided to siphon off JACKET.com for themselves and it will not drop at all&quot;.

Tucows is notorious for this behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It was renewed,so no one can grab it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bugui, a domain cannot be renewed in the Pending Release stage.<br />
I believe Gazzip hit the nail on the head, &#8220;TUCOWS has decided to siphon off JACKET.com for themselves and it will not drop at all&#8221;.</p>
<p>Tucows is notorious for this behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainafterlife.com/?p=377#comment-361</guid>
		<description>if you were trying to get a top tier name why would you post it here? That name (if it went to drop auction) would go for well in the xx,xxx

LOL !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you were trying to get a top tier name why would you post it here? That name (if it went to drop auction) would go for well in the xx,xxx</p>
<p>LOL !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugui</title>
		<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>bugui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainafterlife.com/?p=377#comment-360</guid>
		<description>It was renewed,so no one can grab it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was renewed,so no one can grab it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainafterlife.com/?p=377#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Yes, that can happen much times, exactly that remembers me on past  times, there were a few good hotel names in pending delete status and just the last day before release they becomed registered again ;)
Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that can happen much times, exactly that remembers me on past  times, there were a few good hotel names in pending delete status and just the last day before release they becomed registered again <img src='http://www.domainafterlife.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazzip</title>
		<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Gazzip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainafterlife.com/?p=377#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Best of luck getting JACKET.com, as far as I could tell last night even though Pool and Namejet still showed it as pending delete it has just been registered until 2011.

I &quot;suspect&quot; that the registrar TUCOWS has decided to siphon off  JACKET.com for themselves and it will not drop at all....we shall soon find out !

Good Luck :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best of luck getting JACKET.com, as far as I could tell last night even though Pool and Namejet still showed it as pending delete it has just been registered until 2011.</p>
<p>I &#8220;suspect&#8221; that the registrar TUCOWS has decided to siphon off  JACKET.com for themselves and it will not drop at all&#8230;.we shall soon find out !</p>
<p>Good Luck <img src='http://www.domainafterlife.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parking Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Parking Domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainafterlife.com/?p=377#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Go Daddy will not charge You a fee if Go Daddy cancels Your domain name during this period because of fraud. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nowiw.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Parking Domains&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Daddy will not charge You a fee if Go Daddy cancels Your domain name during this period because of fraud. <a href="http://www.nowiw.com/" rel="nofollow">Parking Domains</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.domainafterlife.com/2009/10/i-am-going-after-these-drops-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainafterlife.com/?p=377#comment-355</guid>
		<description>I think it was renewed within the last few days. Here&#039;s an email from my GoDaddy domain monitor:

We have noted that the following changes occurred between 10/12/2009 and 10/13/2009:

The domain expiration date has been changed:
   OLD: 30-jul-2009                     
   NEW: 30-jul-2011                     

The domain status has been changed:
   OLD: pendingDelete                   
   NEW: clientTransferProhibited        
        clientUpdateProhibited

for the following name(s):
JACKET.COM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was renewed within the last few days. Here&#8217;s an email from my GoDaddy domain monitor:</p>
<p>We have noted that the following changes occurred between 10/12/2009 and 10/13/2009:</p>
<p>The domain expiration date has been changed:<br />
   OLD: 30-jul-2009<br />
   NEW: 30-jul-2011                     </p>
<p>The domain status has been changed:<br />
   OLD: pendingDelete<br />
   NEW: clientTransferProhibited<br />
        clientUpdateProhibited</p>
<p>for the following name(s):<br />
JACKET.COM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

